Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • aports aports
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 662
    • Issues 662
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 315
    • Merge requests 315
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • alpinealpine
  • aportsaports
  • Merge requests
  • !4003

WIP: haskell libraries

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Closed Bart Ribbers requested to merge PureTryOut/aports:haskell-packages into master Feb 13, 2020
  • Overview 23
  • Commits 18
  • Pipelines 8
  • Changes 52

So far our few Haskell packages (e.g. shellcheck) are statically compiled. This is of course not ideal and we should try to move it to dynamic libraries.

For this effort @kdaudt and I packaged some basic Haskell libraries.

It's been stuck in a branch of mine for some months and before I would continue I like to get some opinions on this. Are we packaging this right? Should we package all GHC libraries separately or split it out of the main GHC package like in this branch? Etc.

Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: haskell-packages