Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
aports
aports
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 649
    • Issues 649
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 207
    • Merge Requests 207
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
  • alpine
  • aportsaports
  • Issues
  • #8277

Closed
Open
Opened Dec 13, 2017 by Alicha CH@alichaReporter

[3.4] openssl: Multiple vulnerabilities (CVE-2017-3737, CVE-2017-3738)

CVE-2017-3737: Read/write after SSL object in error state

OpenSSL 1.0.2 (starting from version 1.0.2b) introduced an “error state”
mechanism. The intent was that if a fatal error occurred during a handshake then
OpenSSL would move into the error state and would immediately fail if you
attempted to continue the handshake. This works as designed for the explicit
handshake functions (SSL_do_handshake(), SSL_accept() and SSL_connect()),
however due to a bug it does not work correctly if SSL_read() or SSL_write() is
called directly. In that scenario, if the handshake fails then a fatal error
will be returned in the initial function call. If SSL_read()/SSL_write() is
subsequently called by the application for the same SSL object then it will
succeed and the data is passed without being decrypted/encrypted directly from
the SSL/TLS record layer.

Fixed In:

openssl 1.0.2n

References:

https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20171207.txt

CVE-2017-3738: rsaz_1024_mul_avx2 overflow bug on x86_64

There is an overflow bug in the AVX2 Montgomery multiplication procedure
used in exponentiation with 1024-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected.
Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect
would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks
against DH1024 are considered just feasible, because most of the work
necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline.
The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant.

Fixed In:

openssl 1.0.2n

References:

https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20171207.txt

(from redmine: issue id 8277, created on 2017-12-13, closed on 2017-12-18)

  • Relations:
    • parent #8260 (closed)
  • Changesets:
    • Revision b0c3a0f6 on 2017-12-15T08:29:14Z:
main/openssl: security upgrade to 1.0.2n

fixes #8277

CVE-2017-3737
CVE-2017-3738

(cherry picked from commit b74e9ca7e1962c168d79fc1d11039d7febd5b0e6)
  • Revision 69941fbb on 2018-11-22T15:32:44Z:
main/openssl: security upgrade to 1.0.2n

fixes #8277

CVE-2017-3737
CVE-2017-3738

(cherry picked from commit b74e9ca7e1962c168d79fc1d11039d7febd5b0e6)
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have admin enable hashed storage. More information
Assignee
Assign to
3.4.7
Milestone
3.4.7 (Past due)
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: alpine/aports#8277